←Go back to RSPCA

RSPCA Australia knowledgebase

RSPCA Australia Knowledgebase

Search:     Advanced search

RSPCA Policy A10 Surgical modification of companion animals

Article ID: 162
Last updated: 29 Oct, 2008
Add comment
Views: 2267
Comments: 0
 10.1  RSPCA Australia is opposed to the surgical modification of animals for cosmetic or non-therapeutic purposes. The RSPCA considers the following specific procedures to be unnecessary and detrimental to the welfare of the animal concerned: 
  -  tail docking of dogs
  -  ear-cropping of dogs
 10.2  RSPCA Australia does not support the debarking of dogs to prevent excessive barking unless all other reasonable options have been attempted and the operation is regarded as the only alternative to euthanasia.
 10.3  RSPCA Australia does not support the removal of claws or teeth in companion animals (including dogs, cats and ferrets) unless it is necessary for the welfare of the animal concerned.

(adopted 01/08/08)
This website provides general information which must not be relied upon or regarded as a substitute for specific professional advice, including veterinary advice. We make no warranties that the website is accurate or suitable for a person’s unique circumstances and provide the website on the basis that all persons accessing the website responsibly assess the relevance and accuracy of its content.
Add comment
Also read
document Why is the RSPCA opposed to the tail docking of dogs?

Prev   Next
RSPCA Policy A09 Housing of companion animals     RSPCA Policy A11 Use of cats and dogs for fur or food