←Go back to RSPCA

RSPCA Australia knowledgebase

RSPCA Australia Knowledgebase

Search:     Advanced search

How long should farm animals be deprived of water during the transport process?

Article ID: 711
Last updated: 15 Dec, 2017
Revision: 2
print  Print
share  Share
Views: 625

Livestock transported in Australia are routinely deprived of water for variable periods including curfew (prior to transport), during transport and in saleyards and depots. Under the Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for the Land Transport of Livestock, the maximum total time off water is 48 hours for cattle and goats over the age of 6 months and sheep over the age of 4 months. For adult pigs, the maximum time off water is 24 hours.

Water is required by all animals for survival including maintenance of bodily systems, fluid balance, body temperature, electrolyte concentrations, and to satisfy thirst. Periods of water restriction may pose a risk to animal health and welfare.

The effects of water deprivation can be categorised as clinical (illness or disease state), physiological (changes in functional pathways), behavioural (activity, actions and interactions), and emotional (subjective experience).

The majority of livestock studies focus on the clinical and physiological effects of water deprivation such as clinical dehydration, body weight loss, changes in blood cell counts and blood values including indicators of kidney dysfunction and failure. These studies are rarely conducted on animals subject to the range of stressors inherent in transportation. There is also little research available on the behavioural or emotional effects of water deprivation in livestock despite recommendations for animal welfare standards to take subjective experiences such as thirst into account.

It is often cited that ruminants (animals with a four chambered stomach) such as cattle, goats and sheep can endure longer periods of water deprivation compared to monogastric animals (simple single stomach) such as pigs. The rumen, one of the four ruminant stomach chambers, is regarded as a water “store”. Several studies indicate that in the initial stages of water deprivation, fluid may be drawn from the rumen to address fluid balance. Water deprivation studies on camels (and some breeds of livestock adapted to arid desert conditions) indicate that they may be able to endure longer periods of water deprivation. However in Merino sheep, after 48 hours water deprivation, the rumen contents become increasingly thick and by 72 hours, the “store” of fluid begins to be depleted.

The European Food Safety Authority Panel on Animal Health and Welfare in their report ‘Scientific Opinion Concerning the Welfare of Animals during Transport’ considered the literature available at the time and recommended that healthy adult sheep transported under good conditions can tolerate food and water deprivation up to 48 hours but adult cattle should not be transported longer than 29 hours without food and water due to fatigue and physiological changes. How translatable these recommendations are to Australian livestock transported in Australian conditions is unknown.

Animals’ stress status influences how long they can go without water because hormones released as part of the stress response can have a diuretic effect that contributes to dehydration. The duration of water deprivation that any animal is able to endure may also depend on factors including:

  • Animal factors (eg. species, breed, age, body condition, reproductive status, injury and illness)
  • Environment factors (eg. season, temperature, humidity, shade or shelter, social environment)
  • Management factors (eg. quantity and quality of feed and water provided prior to deprivation, frequency of loading and unloading, stocking density, handling, duration of transport and how the transport is conducted)

The ability of ruminants to endure water deprivation assumes that the animals are well fed and hydrated prior. One study concluded that sheep (in a cool temperate climate) brought immediately in from pasture were “not clinically compromised” by 48 hours of transport where they had no access to feed or water. However, when deprived of both food and water prior to transport, which is common practice in Australia (curfew), sheep energy stores are depleted after 24 hours and they become approximately 10% dehydrated after 72 hours. In 2006, the authors of a report for Meat and Livestock Australia, wrote “It is the opinion of the authors of this review that a practice which routinely resulted in 10% dehydration in animals would not be regarded as acceptable in welfare terms by veterinarians.” In addition, food and water deprivation can lead to changes in the microbiology of the rumen including increased growth of harmful bacteria. In a comprehensive review of the impact of feed and water deprivation on sheep and cattle before and during transport commissioned by Meat and Livestock Australia in 2007, the authors recommended that “Based on the potential for enteropathogen growth and the potential for an increase in stress to the animal, it appears prudent to ensure that total time off food and/or water does not exceed 24 hours.”

From an animal welfare perspective, just because an animal possesses adaptations to endure a period of water deprivation does not mean the animal should be pushed to their limits. In addition, it should be noted that if given the opportunity to exercise choice, these animals would drink suitable water available in a suitable presentation. For example, in most management systems, Bos taurus cattle will drink several times a day.

Contemporary understanding of good animal welfare now extends well beyond simply providing the bare minimum requirements for survival. Hence, rather than approaching the issue of water deprivation by asking: what is the longest time the animal can go without water before survival is threatened, a contemporary understanding of good animal welfare would have us ask: how can we best satisfy the animals’ water needs and choices while minimising the potential clinical, physiological, behavioural and emotional effects of water deprivation.

There is a lack of studies evaluating the appropriate time off water for transported livestock in Australia. However, applying a precautionary principle and taking into account what evidence is available to date, it would appear sensible to apply a maximum time off water which best satisfies the majority of animals’ water needs and choices while minimising the potential ill-effects of water deprivation.


Ali, M. A., Adem, A., Chandranath, I. S., Benedict, S., Pathan, J. Y., Nagelkerke, N., Nyberg, F., Lewis, L. K., Yandle, T. G., Nicholls, G. M., Frampton, C. M., and Kazzam, E. (2012). Responses to Dehydration in the One-Humped Camel and Effects of Blocking the Renin-Angiotensin System. PLOS ONE 7, e37299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037299

Broom, D. M. (2003). Transport stress in cattle and sheep with details of physiological, ethological and other indicators. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 110, 83–88.

Cole, N. A. (2000). Changes in postprandial plasma and extracellular and ruminal fluid volumes in wethers fed or unfed for 72 hours. Journal of Animal Science 78, 216. doi:10.2527/2000.781216x

Cole, N. A. (1995). Influence of a three-day feed and water deprivation period on gut fill, tissue weights, and tissue composition in mature wethers. Journal of animal science 73, 2548–2557.

EFSA AHAW (2011). Scientific Opinion Concerning the Welfare of Animals during Transport: Welfare of Animals during Transport. EFSA Journal 9, 1966. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1966

European Commission Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (2001). The Welfare of Cattle kept for Beef Production. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scah_out54_en.pdf

Fisher, A. D., Colditz, I. G., Lee, C., and Ferguson, D. M. (2009). The influence of land transport on animal welfare in extensive farming systems. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 4, 157–162. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2009.03.002

Fisher, A. D., Niemeyer, D. O., Lea, J. M., Lee, C., Paull, D. R., Reed, M. T., and Ferguson, D. M. (2010). The effects of 12, 30, or 48 hours of road transport on the physiological and behavioral responses of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2144–2152.

Fisher, A., Ferguson, D., Lee, C., Colditz, I., Belson, S., Lapworth, J., and Petherick, C. (2006). Cataloguing Land Transport Science and Practices in Australia. Cataloguing Lan Transport Science and Practices in Australia. Sydney, Australia. Available at: file:///C:/Users/shing/Downloads/AHW.126_Final_Report.pdf

Fisher, M. W., Muir, P. D., Gregory, N. G., Thomson, B. C., Smith, N. B., Johnstone, P. D., and Bicknell, N. (2015). The effects of depriving feed to facilitate transport and slaughter in sheep–a case study of cull ewes held off pasture for different periods. New Zealand veterinary journal 63, 260–264.

Grandin, T. (1997). Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of animal science 75, 249–257.

Hargreaves, A. L., and Matthews, L. R. (1995). The effect of water deprivation and subsequent access to water on plasma electrolytes, haematocrit and behaviour in red deer. Livestock Production Science 42, 73–79. doi:10.1016/0301-6226(94)00069-J

Hecker, J. F., Budtz-Olsen, O. E., and Ostwald, M. (1964). The rumen as a water store in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 961. doi:10.1071/AR9640961

Hogan, J. P., Petherick, J. C., and Phillips, C. J. (2007). The physiological and metabolic impacts on sheep and cattle of feed and water deprivation before and during transport. Nutrition research reviews 20, 17–28.

Kaliber, M., Koluman, N., and Silanikove, N. (2016). Physiological and behavioral basis for the successful adaptation of goats to severe water restriction under hot environmental conditions. Animal: an International Journal of Animal Bioscience; Cambridge 10, 82–88. doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.murdoch.edu.au/10.1017/S1751731115001652

Kyriazakis, I., and Tolkamp, B. (2011). Hunger and Thirst. In ‘Animal Welfare’. (Eds M. C. Appleby, B. O. Hughes, and J. A. Mench.) pp. 44–63. (CABI.)

Macfarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. H., Howard, B., McDonald, J., and Budtz-Olsen, O. E. (1961). Water and electrolyte changes in tropical Merino sheep exposed to dehydration during summer. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 889–912.

Mellor, D. (2012). Animal emotions, behaviour and the promotion of positive welfare states. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 60, 1–8. doi:10.1080/00480169.2011.619047

Mellor, D. J., and Beausoleil, N. J. (2015). Extending the’Five Domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Animal Welfare 24, 241–253.

Mousa, H. M., Ali, K. E., and Hume, I. D. (1983). Effects of water deprivation on urea metabolism in camels, desert sheep and desert goats fed dry desert grass. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 74, 715–720.

Parker, A. J., Hamlin, G. P., Coleman, C. J., and Fitzpatrick, L. A. (2003). Dehydration in stressed ruminants may be the result of acortisol-induced diuresis. Journal of Animal Science 81, 512. doi:10.2527/2003.812512x

Phillips, C. (2008). ‘Cattle Behaviour and Welfare’. (John Wiley & Sons.)

Silanikove, N. (1992). Effects of water scarcity and hot environment on appetite and digestion in ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 30, 175–194. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(06)80009-6

Stricker, E. M., and Sved, A. F. (2000). Thirst. Nutrition 16, 821–826. doi:10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00412-3

This article was:  

Also read
folder What is the RSPCA doing about transportation of farm animals?
folder RSPCA Policy F1 Transportation of animals - general principles
folder RSPCA Policy F2 Transportation of livestock for slaughter
folder What influences animal welfare at saleyards?
folder How do young calves cope with transport?

Also listed in
folder RSPCA policies -> F - Transportation of animals

Prev     Next
How do young calves cope with transport?       How much milk should dairy calves be fed?